- Stewardship education
- Seminars
- For youth
- Spirit of Generosity
- Library
- God
- Money
- Are you ready?
- Credit Card Bondage
- Do they REALLY need it all
- Financially Healthy Church
- Guardianship
- In Praise of Smaller Tax Refunds
- Just Say Charge It!
- Life Insurance... Yes or No
- Living on the Edge
- Money and Marriage
- Money, Money, Money
- Payday Loans and Cash Advances
- Peace of mind $ can't buy
- Show me the Money
- Stable in Turbulent Times
- The Myth of Equality
- Thy Will be Done
- Where will you be in 2048?
- Me
The Myth of Equality
Edwin Friesen
Like most people planning their estates, I am committed to an equal distribution to our children – equal in that they would each receive the same dollar amount or assets of similar value. After all, we love our children equally so they should receive equally. That is the ideal of most parents but that is hardly ever possible or practical. Here is why.
Unless you have only one child or only a set of twins or triplets, the different ages at which the children receive their inheritance is a factor. The oldest child may get their inheritance at age 65 and the youngest at age 50. In theory that gives the younger one 15 more years to invest the funds. The heirs may have received the same dollar amount but not the same benefit potential. The older child has less time to invest and enjoy the inheritance. The greater the age differences between the oldest and the youngest, the greater the disparity. Is that equal?
One or several of the children may have continued working on the
family farm/business, becoming shareholders, maybe even the principle
owner(s) while their siblings pursued other careers. Years later, if
the farm or business has done well, the non-farm/business siblings may
feel they deserve to enjoy some of the farm/business success. After
all, shouldn’t all of the children benefit equally from the farm or
business started by their parents? And what if they want to buy into
the family farm/business at that time, do the original siblings have an
obligation to them? Are the siblings who took the risk over the years
now obligated to share the reward?
Let’s try the shoe on the other foot. Suppose that in spite of hard
work and good management the family farm/business failed. Are the
non-farming/business family members expected to share in the loss? What
if one of the non-farming/business children strikes it rich with their
investments? Is that wealth personal or is it shared with the rest of
the family? Does sharing apply only when assets increase?
If you are the parent and you find yourself looking for easy answers to these succession questions, you may be disappointed. However here are some rules of thumb that you may find helpful.
- "Trust the Lord with all your heart; do not depend on your own understanding. Seek his will in all you do, and he will direct your paths.” Prov 3:5-6. Asking God for wisdom seems self-evident, but we need to be reminded.
- Learn from others who have gone (or are going) through similar situations.
- Seek help from professional advisors in succession planning.
- Dialogue openly about your estate plans and include the non-farming/business family members as appropriate.
- Assure everyone that you love them equally and that your goal is equality as far as reasonably possible given your unique family circumstances.
- Life is a series of opportunities and challenges. Potential heirs must realize that no one can turn back the clock to redo life. We have to live with the choices we made along life’s way. We need to accept the present and then plan for the future.
First published in 2007.
